[ Avaa Bypassed ]




Upload:

Command:

hmhc3928@3.23.103.14: ~ $
#
# test different behavior of ndb using different binlog formats
#

-- source include/have_blackhole.inc
-- source include/have_ndb.inc
-- source include/have_log_bin.inc

--disable_query_log
CALL mtr.add_suppression("Unsafe statement written to the binary log using statement format since BINLOG_FORMAT = STATEMENT");
--enable_query_log

	#
# Bug #29222 Statement mode replicates both statement and
# rows when writing to an NDB table
#
CREATE TABLE t1 (m INT, n INT) ENGINE=MYISAM;
CREATE TABLE t2 (b INT, c INT) ENGINE=BLACKHOLE;
CREATE TABLE t3 (e INT, f INT) ENGINE=NDB;
RESET MASTER;
SET SESSION BINLOG_FORMAT=STATEMENT;
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES (1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2);
UPDATE t1, t2 SET m = 2, b = 3 WHERE n = c;
# A transaction here is not necessary, but I wanted to group the bad statements
START TRANSACTION;
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES (1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2);
UPDATE t1, t3 SET m = 2, e = 3 WHERE n = f;
UPDATE t3, t2 SET e = 2, b = 3 WHERE f = c;
--echo NOTE! This testcase is affected by bug11932585
--echo the above UPDATE is binlogged in own transation
COMMIT;
--source include/show_binlog_events.inc
DROP TABLE t1, t2, t3;


Filemanager

Name Type Size Permission Actions
ndb_binlog_basic.test File 2.23 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_ddl_multi.test File 3.7 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_discover.test File 1.11 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_format.test File 1.16 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_get_binlog_stmts.inc File 122 B 0644
ndb_binlog_get_binlog_stmts_basic.inc File 2.91 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_ignore_db-master.opt File 53 B 0644
ndb_binlog_ignore_db.test File 2.17 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_log_apply_status.test File 1.68 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_log_bin.test File 1.33 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_multi.test File 3.23 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_restore.test File 4.96 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_unique_epoch.cnf File 164 B 0644
ndb_binlog_unique_epoch.test File 3.66 KB 0644
ndb_binlog_variants.cnf File 999 B 0644
ndb_binlog_variants.test File 6.11 KB 0644